David Brooks on the new Ross Perot.
There’s going to be another Ross Perot, and this time he’s going to be younger. There’s going to be a millionaire rising out of the country somewhere and he (or she) is going to lead a movement of people who are worried about federal deficits, who are offended by the horrendous burden seniors are placing on the young and who are disgusted by a legislative process that sometimes suggests that the government has lost all capacity for self-control.
…
He’s going to rail against a country that cannot control its appetites. He’s going to rail against Republicans who promise to be virtuous - but not just yet. He’s going to slam Democrats who loudly jeer at Republican deficits but whose own entitlement proposals would make the situation twice as bad. He’s going to crusade against the interest groups who are so ferocious on behalf of their members that they sacrifice the future.
It’s probably just me, but the tone of Brooks’ editorial isn’t so much prediction as it is forewarning, as if Brooks already knows who is coming, is on his his side, and is preparing the ground in advance.
So, who is it?
My guess, based on the thinnest of suppositions, is that it’s Jim Clark.
Anyone else like to take a stab at it?
